Mel Gibson is an ass, and an anti-semitic one at that. But can anyone tell me why Mel appears to be receiving more grief for his stated beliefs than, say, Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, who doesn't limit himself to drunkenly ranting about the Jews doing this or doing that, but actively seeks to kill them, and not without a certain level of success.
Mel has apologized, and you can take that for whatever its worth. Meanwhile. Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah has promised to kill more Jews as soon as he has the chance.
What is wrong with this picture?
We can't do anything about Nasrallah. If we asked him for an apology for his publically-stated (and sober -- good Muslims don't drink booze) intentions, he'd laugh in our faces, before pulling out an AK and blowing us to bits. But Mel? He's ours. He'll do whatever we want because he depends on us for his income. Attacking him lets us regain self-esteem we lose in the face of true evil.
Posted by: Andrea Harris at 09:17 PMUSA as you claim is the country of freedom & democracy ..
So; Mel can express his own ideas freely, and if he admires Sayyed Hassan (as I do) so U must respect his point iof view...
By the way, you must see the other part of truth...Israel committed too many massacres in Lebanon they killed innocent children who has nothing to do with DIRTY POLITICAL STRUGLLES...
Nasrallah is not fighting Zionest & not Jews...
BE JUST FOR ONE TIME IN UR LIFE...
Posted by: amon at 04:06 AMAll caps, misspellings, and open admiration of terrorist creeps are no way to go through life, son.
Posted by: Andrea Harris at 02:37 PM